Friday, January 26, 2007

I'm a tolerant man...

...I don't have any religious believes and i think if people have a religion they should be allowed to practice it. I think they are fucking daft but they have the right to be so. Obviously if your religion involves human sacrifice that would be a no no, but as far as i can see christians, jews, muslims, hindus, sikhs, buddhists and whoever else despite differences of faith should be able to coexist, the basic pricnciples often seem to have things about being nice to other people.

Sure there is some smiting of infidels talk, but on the whole most people that practice a faith do nothing more annoying than knock on your door, or prattle on using a loudspeaker at busy town centres.

That said i think state institutions, government, schools, social services, police etc should all be secular. We all have basic human rights, I don't see that the church and religion should have any say in how the world is run. You have your believes and the people who follow act on them.

Sometimes though we get friction as religious believes collide with the way society as a whole is developing, and sometimes there is no way to reconcile the two.

Adoption by gay couples is the latest issue. A local councillor in my area actually quit the labour party in dismay at their moves on this issue. I find that truly depressing that legislation designed to forbid discriminating against people on their sexuality can be considered an outrage but the same person didn't feel quite as morally bound by say a decsion to illegally invade a foreign country leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people and destabalize the middle east even further.

How does this guy reconcile the two. I have some sympathy if he follows his faith, homosexuality i believe is considered a sin. I don't agree there myself but you have say better to be wrong than a hypocrit. However i'm sure there have been other gay related issues in the past, that the same councillor also didn't stand down over.

Apparantly about 75% of british people believe if some kind of god, albeit only about
3% feel the need to worship them on a regular basic. I'm sorry there maybe a lot of latent vague fuzzy belief but we live in an essentially secular country. I think it's long past time we formalised that and getting a two for price of one deal removed our monarchy and church from running of the state. I'd also like a new written constitution, been reading Thomas Paine's The Rights of Man recently, talked a lot of sense that lad. He also wrote the Age of Reason, which i struggled to find in bookshops but found easily enough at amazon, which more pertinantly questions the role of religion and christian believes in our society. Not bought or read that yet, but will get round to it.

Our political process is shite in essence, time we wiped the slate screen and started again. Wandered a bit there, but what the fuck.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Illuminating graph

Hmmm, over simplifying maybe but i wouldn't lend George Bush five quid let alone trust him and his advisors to run a major industrial nation!

Another cut and paste article...

...but one that does sum up a lot that is wrong with the world!

Mark Steel: There will be a Tesco store in your bedroom next

People are lured by cheapness, but pay for it by spending their time there in a vegetative trance

Published: 24 January 2007

Tesco is terrifying. It's unstoppable, like bindweed. You couldn't even organise a guerrilla army against it because if you blew one up, two would spring up in its place. They must land in the night, like Triffids. Soon they'll have permission to set up Tesco mini-stores in your house, so you'll get up one morning and there it will be in your bedroom. And a PR spokesman will issue a statement: "Our customers have indicated that any lack of privacy that may result from having a shop by their wardrobe is compensated by the convenience of being able to purchase lasagne or shoe polish in the middle of the night without getting up."

But this Monopolies Commission report that's come out doesn't seem to care. It was set up specifically to comment on this rampaging monster and concluded it should be alright if it doesn't go much further. Who compiled that then - Neville Chamberlain? There's already hardly anything left they don't dominate. Next they'll take over drug-dealing, launching their new line with an advert in which Prunella Scales says to Jane Horrocks: "Don't expect me to do any housework tonight dear - not while Tesco are offering springtime savings on a quarter ounce of top quality Afghan skunk."

It's hard to identify what's so grotesque about these places, as they claim they're only so profitable because customers choose to go there. But a starting point has to be that no one in Tesco is ever happy. People are lured by cheapness and convenience, but then they pay for that by spending their time there in a vegetative trance, staring aimlessly into the despotic white light, maybe drifting back into consciousness for a moment to whack their kids on the back of their legs for climbing on the trolley, before the regular beep-beep of the bar code machine returns them to their hypnotic dreamy half-life.

Maintaining your faculties in a queue at Tesco is almost impossible. Once you're stuck behind six families with overflowing trolleys before it's your turn, you could be a multilingual biochemist and you'd struggle to remember the capital of France. These conditions should be used for training people who need to be able to think clearly in extreme circumstances, because if you can keep your thought process at 90 per cent in a Tesco queue, then repairing an oxygen mask while in space must be a piece of piss. And you even have to hire the trolley for a pound - the bâstards. Even in Abu Ghraib they don't make you pay for use of the cattle prod.

And that's why it's wrong. Every boast they make is actually its crime. It is horribly irredeemably joylessly functional. Every tin of custard powder is placed at such an angle to entice you to chuck it in the trolley. Every tomato is perfectly spherically fluorescent. Occasionally they might decide that customers have indicated they appreciate conversational check-out staff, so the check-out staff will be ordered to say: "Hope you enjoy your evening." But that's worse than if they stared into space.

Tesco is the extreme end of modern town planning, in which every town is planned to look tortuously identical. You could be in Kettering or Greenland and you know that as you leave the centre of town, past Body Shop and River Island and Clinton Cards and some poor sod selling chocolate-covered almonds, down the road with the building societies and the Wetherspoons pub, just past the Esso garage and maybe a Big Yellow storage place, there it will be with its vast car park, symmetrical shrubs and slightly wrong clock.

Even the claim that shopping in Tesco saves time is mostly a con. People say: "At least I can get everything in one place." But the place is bigger than an average High Street. You might as well say: "I go shopping abroad because at least you can get everything in one place - France."

Or there's some "new" thing they're doing that's pointless, such as pre-packed diced pyramids of rhubarb, or bananas in balloons. "Now you don't have to pick your bananas off the shelf, just pluck them from the air as they float round in balloons that keep them extra-nana-fresh!"

All that driving and jostling can't make it much quicker or cheaper than going to a local shop, except the local shop's probably shut down because of Tesco. Then they boast they've set up a "green fund" when they're responsible for so many car journeys they'd be more green if they spent all day melting icebergs with a blowtorch.

And of course, because they're a massive multinational whose aim is profit, they screw people all over the world. So one report by Action Aid quotes a farm worker who picks fruit for a Tesco supplier in South Africa: "I sleep on the floor in a plastic sheet. There's no water or electricity and the walls of my shack are made of cardboard." For this she gets $18 a week. And they probably encourage them to buy the sheets from the local Tescos, who advertise: "Your sleep is complete on a sheet from Tescos."

But on and on they march. Soon they'll have their own team in the Olympics, then they'll develop a nuclear capacity and eventually rule everything. And we'd at least stand a chance if the next report says: "Look, the economics of it are a bit complicated to be honest. But what we do know is that Tescos is an abomination devoid of love or affection or humanity or imagination or even genuine animosity that could make a day interesting or unpredictable, just a corporate tyrant devouring us all with its soulless and chillingly inconvenient convenience."

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

In honour...

...of me buying his book The Great War for Civilisation: The Conquest of the Middle East I thought I would post an excellent article by Robert Fisk. Had really meant to do it at the weekend but it's done now.

Slightly annoying though, I bought the book for £9.99 at Waterstones and given it's a chunky tome felt well pleased at the good value for money, only to see it a week later in a WH Smith half price!

Robert Fisk: Fear climate change, not our enemies

From this wreckage was bound to come the insurgencies and the hatred

Published: 20 January 2007

It was a warning. Scratched, of course after more than 50 years, but a home movie, shot by my mother in colour. But most of the colour is white. Bill Fisk, the 57-year-old borough treasurer of Maidstone, is standing in the garden of our home in his long black office coat, wearing - as always - his First World War regimental tie, throwing snow balls at his son. I am 10 years old, in short trousers but up to my waist in snow. There must have been two feet of it in the garden. You can even see the condensation from my mouth. My mother doesn't appear on the film of course. She is standing in the snow behind my father, 36 years old, the daughter of café proprietors who every Boxing Day would host my own and my aunt's family with a huge lunch and a roaring log fire. It really was cold then.

I think was it Andrew Marr, when editor of The Independent, who first made me think about what was happening. It was a stiflingly hot summer and I had just arrived in London from Beirut and commented that there wasn't much difference in temperature. And Andrew turned round and pointed across the city. "Something's gone wrong with the bloody weather!" he roared. And of course, he was right.

Now I acknowledge it silently: the great storms that sweep across Europe, the weird turbulence that my passenger jet pilots experience high over the Atlantic. Because I have never travelled so far or so frequently, I notice that at year's end it's 15 degrees in Toronto and Montreal - a "springtime Christmas", the Canadian papers announce in a land famous for its tundra. In Denver, the airport is blocked by snowfalls. I return to Lebanon to find so little snow has fallen that much of Mount Sannine above my home is the colour of grey rock, just a dressing of white on the top. The snow is deep in Jerusalem. There is a water shortage in Beirut.

How casually these warnings come to us. How casually we treat them. I suspect that most people feel so detached from political power - so hopeless when faced with a world tragedy - they can do nothing but watch in growing anger and distress. Water levels in the world's oceans may rise 20 feet higher, we are told. And I calculate that in Beirut, the Mediterranean - in rough weather -- will be splashing over my second-floor balcony wall.

I curl down deep in my bed, because the nights are strangely damp and read by the bedside light, Hans von Sponeck's gripping, painful account of his years as the UN's Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq, A Different Kind of War, an analysis of the vicious, criminal sanctions regime levelled against the Iraqi people between 1990 and 2003. Here, for example, is what Sergei Lavrov, the Russian ambassador to the UN wrote in March 2000: "...the scale of the humanitarian catastrophe in Iraq is inexorably leading to the disintegration of the very fabric of civil society." It was "a situation where an entire generation of Iraqis has been physically and morally crippled". The French ambassador to the UN, Alain Dejammet, spoke similarly of "the very serious humanitarian crisis in Iraq", a crime that would eventually persuade von Sponeck to resign.

Another warning. I remember how von Sponeck said the very same words to me in Baghdad. So did Denis Halliday, his predecessor. But when Peter Hain - now so desperately anxious to distance himself from US policies in Iraq - was asked to comment, he said that von Sponeck and Halliday were "obviously not the right men for the job". James Rubin, then earning his keep as Madeleine Albright's spokesman, said that von Sponeck "is paid to work, not to speak".

Yet there are all the warnings. Did we really think that after we had impoverished them and destroyed so many of their children; after a generation of Iraqis had been "physically and morally crippled", they were going to welcome our "liberation"? From this wreckage of Iraq was bound to come the insurgencies and the hatreds now tearing its people apart and destroying the presidency of George W. Bush and the prime ministership of Tony Blair.

Yet what do they tell us? They still want us to be frightened. Terror, terror, terror. Now we have Doctor Death, our Home Secretary, telling us that the War on Terror could last as long as the Cold War. Recently, it was the Dowager of Fear in charge of our intelligence services who said that the War on Terror could last "a generation". So that's 30 years? Or 60 like Dr Death claimed? Bush claimed it might last "forever", surely an ambitious goal for an ex- governor-executioner.

What these men know, of course, while waffling about our "values", is that the only way to lessen the risk of attack in London or Washington is to adopt a moral, just policy towards the Middle East. Failure to do this - and the Blairs and the Bushes clearly have no intention of doing so - means that we will be bombed again. And the words of Dr Death were not a warning to us. They were not intended to prepare us for the future. They were intended to allow him to say "told you so" when the next backpacker murders the innocent on the London tube system. And then we will be told that we need even harsher legislation. And we will have to be afraid.

Yes, we must fear. We must wake every morning in fear. We must bend our entire political system into a machine of fear. Organised society must revolve around our fear. Like the terrorologists of old - the Claire Sterlings and Brian Croziers of this world who told us of thousands of terrorists, "bands of professional practitioners dispensing violent death", all trained in Cuba, North Korea, the Soviet Union or Eastern Europe - Dr Death and Lord Blair of Kut al-Amara and former foreign secretary Jack "the Veil" Straw (remember him?) - want us to live in fear. They want us to be afraid.

I think we should be afraid - of what we are doing to our planet. But we should not fear our enemies in the world. They will return. Our western occupation of so many Muslim lands have assured us of this fate. But if we can now end our injustice in the Middle East, Dr Death's 60 years could be over before he leaves his high office. Now there's a thought.

Meanwhile, watch the world and the weather and the turbulence at high altitude. And remember the snow in Maidstone.

Monday, January 22, 2007

Rare posting not about book...

...though i will tack on a little book progress at the end.

Watched a film i enjoyed more than any 'veseen in quite a long time. Finding Neverland about the author of Peter Pan, JM Barrie. I had been aware of it for some time and had heard only good things about it, just never got round to it. It's a wee quiet movie that for it has little flashes of imaginative grandeur is just all about the characters and is quietly effective and I found very moving. Welling up near the end so I was, not that many films that I remember doing that whilst watching.

Off the top of my head only Strictly Ballroom(which i also watched quite recently again), the bit in Revenge of the Sith when all the Jedi are betrayed and killed, the of last episode of series 6 Red Dwarf have been known to bring a tear to the eye. Sure there have been others, there is something else i saw a few times on the tip of my tongue that i can't quite remember, but it's not that often is the main point.

So i was quite glad to have seen it and i would reccomend it it well anyone who can enjoy a film that doesn't need to have lots of action to keep them interested. Oh yeah another reason i was pleasantly surprised at enjoying it was that i really really did not like Peter Pan. Two reasons for that.

Number one is that as well as I remember is that it was the first ever film I was taken to see as a child. It was a family outing to the then 'big' cinema in Hamilton which had 3 screens. (Was a cracking wee cinema that shames it's been knocked down and replaced by a souless multiplex.) There was myself, my mum, my big sister and my gran. However my mum and sister went to see Police Academy 3 and I had to go with my gran to see a cartoon version of Peter Pan and I was in a right huff about it and didn't enjoy it one bit. I think i moaned so much that a week later my sister was sent with me to go and see Police Academy 3 again, which at the time I loved and developed a long lasting fascination with. I'll still quite happily watch any of the first 3 of a sunday afternoon but by god after that it's an impressive feat how each one after manages to be worse than the last. I still remember with horror going to see Mission to Moscow with low low expectations and managing to be disappointed.

The second reason is the film Hook. I thought it was awful enough in itself but again it was a film I saw not through choice. Was on a school ski trip the year it was out and due to a lack of snow we ended up in the nearest cinema and this is what we were essentially forced to watch, no choice in the matter was that or sit on a bus probably. If the bus option was real rather than imagined i wish i would have went for that as i thought it was terrible terrible film and despite been a non Peter Pan lover it seem to border on the sacriligeous.

So despite bad Peter Pan experiences I found Finding Neverland really good and well i think the original Peter Pan is probably worth reassessing as the way the film ties in real life to the play gave it a lot more emotional depth.

Book progress. 17 chapters and about 72,500 words written. Been having to do a lot of thinking, some big final decisions on the fates of characters and so on. My structure outline has always been a guide rather than a strick backbone to the story, after a lot of thinking on friday and this morning I think I have about nailed down pretty much exactly how it's all going to finish. Which means barring a really big change I have 4 chapters left to write. Next one is a big one though, it might have to be split into two, but I'll not know though that until I've written it. Started on it this very day.

Friday, January 12, 2007

70,000 words....

...and on we go. It has been a bit of a slog trying to get back into a rythmn. I'm always easily distracted at best of times but after a couple of weeks off picking up has been hard work.

I found that all chapter 17 has been really just two characters talking to each other. I managed to think of a good enough reason to change that and bring in other characters and a part of the story that was otherwise only being referred to but that is still the core of it. I really not sure if I'm happy about it, certainly happier since i changed it. Although it did mean sitting down away from keyboard with notebook and seeing how it affected what i down before and planned for after.

It did change some stuff, but only a little and i not had to do anything drastic with the current plan. It'll do for the now, with luck it'll fill the structural requirements and when i read over it hopefully can improve some of the dialogue make it if not actually fizz, then maybe bubble gently and not seem like a slow bit of talky nonsense.

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Happy New Year...

...bit late but hardly matters. Work reatarts on the grand novel project tomorrow. Desk and work area been cleared out ready for a new beginning. And hopefully a more literal ending quite soon.