new terrorism laws

Again even on first glance a law that can make an offence from, "indirect incitement to commit terrorist acts," is almost carte blanche for banging people up. That could be almost anything, apparantly examples of what it will cover will be given, but unless it's more pinned down could i possibly get done for describing the US government as the biggest state sponsor of terrorism in the world. It happens to be true, but while i settle for banging on about it here and to long suffering friends, could it not indirectly inspire a less stable mind to do something of a terrorist nature. Would i have indirectly incited a terrorist act by writing about say what the US government(note government any US readers please don't think i'm automaticaly anti american, america has much to be proud of, just your government is less that squeaky clean) has done over the years in Cuba, Chile, El Salvador, Nicaragua etc?